wayne wrote:
I *do* think that adding (and recommend using) a scope=
keyword is a good idea. What do other people think?
With two of these Received-SPF: header beasts per mail that's
unnecessary:
| SPF clients SHOULD give at least the "client-ip" and either
| the "envelope-from" or "helo" information so that the SPF
| results can be verified.
If it has an "@" it's no HELO and v.v. You also propose helo=
or envelope-from= resp. values, only the "two of these beasts"
idea is/was unclear. But isn't adding "none" or "neutral" for
a HELO result close to abuse, who needs this info ? Bye, Frank