spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: For SPF council review: Policy for shared MTAs

2005-05-12 09:42:21
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Julian Mehnle wrote:

I think Scott's text suggestion would be appropriate for section 9.4, but I 
also think that in order to complete the envelope sender forgery 
protection already provided by SPF, significant further steps are 
necessary, and that prevention of cross-user forgery is one of the most 
important.  So perhaps a sub-section should be added in the Security 
Considerations section, and section 9.4 should just point to that?

This would be helpful.  My attempts to explain the need for cross-user
forgery prevention to commercial SMTP AUTH providers have failed.
As a result, they are no help in getting a reliable PASS instead of neutral.
I would really like to have an SMTP company I could direct domains with
no static IP to for proper authentication.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>