spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass".

2005-06-03 11:08:13
Julian Mehnle wrote:

Responsibility of the domain has always been an essential
part of SPF.

It is also an essential part of STD 10 and *THE* reason why I
consider RfC 2821 and mail-arch-04 as partially bogus, where
they claim to remove this responsibility.

OTOH it's not the job of the SPF draft to state "updates 2821".

draft-irtf-asrg-lmap-discussion-01.txt (IRTF ASRG LMAP) said:

| These proposals change the semantics of the MAIL FROM command
| as defined in RFC 2821, section 3.3. to imply that the domain
| in the source mailbox is also the responsible party for
| sending the message, and thus must be verified.

SPF does *NOT* change the semantics of the MAIL FROM in STD 10.
The "bounces-to" sociopaths try this.  Die, spammer, die.  Bye