op=dkim

Hi, is an op=dkim useful ?  It could mean "if you see any mail
claiming to be MAIL FROM user(_at_)domain without DKIM reject it".

                         Bye, Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
op=dkim, Frank Ellermann <= Re: op=dkim, Terry Fielder Re: op=dkim, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: op=dkim, Hector Santos 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Jeroen Massar Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Frank Ellermann Re: Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Jeroen Massar Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, Daniel Taylor Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, wayne

Previous by Date:	Re: bogusmx, Frank Ellermann
Next by Date:	Re: op=dkim, Terry Fielder
Previous by Thread:	Anyone else need write access?, Daniel Taylor
Next by Thread:	Re: op=dkim, Terry Fielder
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]