In <42A1291B(_dot_)466C(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:
wayne wrote:
The why.html page still isn't working, but I think I know
what is wrong.
Oh shit, Meng dumped that issue on you after six months and
at a time when you need every free second for the SPF spec. :-(
Actually, the SPF I-D load is lightening up. Meng didn't dump stuff
on me, a while back, I actually asked for it.
I don't think we have come to any conclusion about what the
offical SPF domain name should be.
Anything without PRA / SID / SenderID / ads will do. Assuming
valid HTML without absolute sizes.
Yeah, there is a *lot* of work to be done. I don't think the current
website is really that wonderful a base to start with HTML/style wise,
but I think we can fix quite a few of the worst problems pretty
quickly.
I also need to finish editing the SPF I-D. I need to respond
to some SPF comments on the ietf-822 list. I need to do
quite a few things.
I guess you mean the SMTP list, the 822 list was rather quiet.
Somebody on SMTP found a conflict between 3.1.1 and 4.5 in -01.
Uh, yeah, one of those lists. I need to investigate all that stuff
further. It isn't going to happen tonight.
-wayne