-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
william(at)elan.net wrote:
Chuck,
I don't doubt that you're doing your best to get the new site & content
up, please keep at it
But if you want to get some continued critisicm off, may I suggest a
small step in the right direction such as perhaps getting rid of
"SPF is an essential part of SenderID" and replacing that text with
"SPF is not a part of SenderID" with link to your press-release on this
topic on council's website.
I would LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEE to do that... I
wonder if I have the copyrights I need to edit that content?
Or possibly replace the "SPF is an essential part of SenderID" with
"Please read more about SPF Community position on SenderID here" with
link to openspf.org.
I don't think I would send them there... the first two links I tried on
that site are broken.
- --
csm(_at_)moongroup(_dot_)com, head geek
http://moongroup.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCvVPVv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAjPQAJ9hEDJ8aUwojUzuP+T5YTSBdlAFKgCeIi24
tLmzU0vp6ZYJmFCMl8JTigU=
=737F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----