>>That amounts to SPF is useless without reputation. FUD.
>
>That's not what I meant, and if you include the immediately prior context,
>you will see that.
>
>I guess it's time for me to move on. I wish you well. I hope SPF
succeeds.
If that's not what you meant, fine. Even in context it read to me like the
standard FUD tactic of complaining something is useless because it won't do
something it wasn't designed to do. I guess I was mistaken.
I do hope you don't move on.
Stuart, thanks for the clarification. I will continue reading the list,
but refrain from offering any more "neutral" advice. It's just not being
accepted, or even understood, by any of the warring camps. My main efforts
now are on a neutral "Registry" that does not depend on cooperation of
senders, or any approval from IETF.
--
Dave
************************************************************ *
* David MacQuigg, PhD email: david_macquigg at yahoo.com * *
* IC Design Engineer phone: USA 520-721-4583 * * *
* Analog Design Methodologies * * *
* 9320 East Mikelyn Lane * * *
* VRS Consulting, P.C. Tucson, Arizona 85710 *
************************************************************ *