-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Scott
Kitterman
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:55 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] When does the record end? was: SPF Validation
Tools - Yet Another One
...... Original Message .......
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:00:51 -0400 (EDT) "Stuart D. Gathman"
<stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'm still a bit uncertain what to do about 'moo'.
It is easy enough to collect the mechanisms before matching - just
like we already do with modifiers. I can make that change if you like.
If you get to it, great. If not, I will. The uncertainty was more if I
should worry about 'moo'. I think I should, but this should only
PermError
if using the strict case.
I think we may eventually want another case, perhaps called 'harsh' that
errors on any uncertainty...
Scott K
OK. Thanks Stuart for the quick pySPF change. The tool now operates in
harsh mode. I'll look for more chances to be harsh (to many MX/PTR for one
to start with).
BTW, the result for the record that started all this is now PermError due to
the unknown mechanism 'moo'.
Scott K