SPF Discuss (date)
July 31, 2005
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, johnp, 13:02
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:56
- RE: What to do about the SPF domain name, Mark, 12:53
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, wayne, 11:28
- Re: Somebody else interesting in SPF for whitelisting..., wayne, 11:16
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Arjen de Korte, 06:30
July 28, 2005
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, johnp, 23:44
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Frank Ellermann, 22:05
- RE: What to do about the SPF domain name, Guy, 21:45
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Terry Fielder, 21:22
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Constantine A. Murenin, 21:13
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, wayne, 19:44
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, wayne, 19:42
- RE: What to do about the SPF domain name, Seth Goodman, 14:53
- RE: What to do about the SPF domain name, Bruce Barnes, 14:31
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, wayne, 12:15
- RE: What to do about the SPF domain name, Scott Kitterman, 12:14
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Frank Ellermann, 12:06
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, wayne, 11:41
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, jeremy+spf, 11:33
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, johnp, 11:28
- Re: What to do about the SPF domain name, Terry Fielder, 11:23
- What to do about the SPF domain name, wayne, 11:12
- SPF Checks After RCPT TO:, Scott Kitterman, 07:15
July 26, 2005
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- RE: http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html SPF Validation, Scott Kitterman, 07:15
- RE: http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html SPF Validation, Scott Kitterman, 05:49
- Re: SPF Specs (please ignore last question), Arjen de Korte, 04:32
- SPF Specs (please ignore last question), Craig Whitmore, 04:26
- SPF Specs, Craig Whitmore, 04:24
July 25, 2005
- RE: http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html SPF Validation, Stuart D. Gathman, 22:24
- CEAS paper: "SMTP Path Analysis" using SPF and reputations, wayne, 21:17
- RE: http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html SPF Validation, Scott Kitterman, 20:50
- Re: Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, wayne, 20:05
- Re: http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html SPF Validation, wayne, 19:04
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, wayne, 17:26
- http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html SPF Validation, Craig Whitmore, 17:21
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, Michael Elliott, 13:25
- Re: Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Daniel Taylor, 12:52
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, wayne, 06:21
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, Rene Barbier, 05:00
July 24, 2005
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, Frank Ellermann, 10:43
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, wayne, 06:11
- Re: Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, wayne, 06:09
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:11
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, johnp, 04:57
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, Julian Mehnle, 04:34
July 23, 2005
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Frank Ellermann, 20:53
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, wayne, 08:45
- Re: Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, wayne, 08:39
- Re: Is anyone doing PRA checks?, johnp, 08:36
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Frank Ellermann, 05:39
- Is anyone doing PRA checks?, wayne, 05:35
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, wayne, 05:18
- Re: Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, wayne, 05:15
July 22, 2005
- FIT : Fraud Investigations Team : case 1287 / 2005 ., Paypal Security Service, 18:12
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Frank Ellermann, 14:48
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Daniel Taylor, 14:01
- Re: Misdirected bounces due to SPF failures, Daniel Taylor, 13:21
- Misdirected bounces due to SPF failures (was: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive), Julian Mehnle, 13:13
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Julian Mehnle, 12:40
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Julian Mehnle, 12:34
- Re: Report on the SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 10:44
- Apache 2 and the website, Julian Mehnle, 09:59
- RE: Multiple Received-SPF headers, Allyn Wade, 09:40
- Re: Multiple Received-SPF headers, wayne, 08:16
- RE: CNAME limit, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:33
- RE: Multiple Received-SPF headers, Scott Kitterman, 06:19
- SPF Mayhem on way ? - From postfix-users, Scott Kitterman, 06:14
- RE: CNAME limit, Scott Kitterman, 06:04
- Multiple Received-SPF headers, Hector Santos, 01:59
July 21, 2005
- RE: CNAME limit, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:28
- Re: CNAME limit, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:20
- RE: CNAME limit, Scott Kitterman, 19:19
- Re: CNAME limit, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:38
- Re: CNAME limit, wayne, 18:36
- Re: CNAME limit, wayne, 18:24
- Re: CNAME limit, william(at)elan.net, 18:19
- CNAME limit, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:07
- Re: Enon.com Customer SPF Records Being Fixed, wayne, 16:23
- Re: Report on the SPF website (Was: Report on the Email Authentication Summit), Frank Ellermann, 16:20
- Re: Report on the Email Authentication Summit, Commerco WebMaster, 15:59
- Enon.com Customer SPF Records Being Fixed, Craig Whitmore, 15:37
- Report on the SPF website (Was: Report on the Email Authentication Summit), wayne, 12:13
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Dick St.Peters, 12:10
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Frank Ellermann, 12:06
- Re: Report on the Email Authentication Summit, John Hinton, 11:50
- Re: Report on the Email Authentication Summit, Hector Santos, 11:18
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Dick St.Peters, 10:56
- Re: SPFv1 record failure cases, Daniel Taylor, 10:19
- Report on the Email Authentication Summit, wayne, 10:16
- SPFv1 record failure cases, wayne, 10:14
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:05
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Daniel Taylor, 07:51
July 20, 2005
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:36
- Re: When does the record end?, Frank Ellermann, 18:13
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Scott Kitterman, 18:05
- Re: Test tool for type 99, Frank Ellermann, 18:00
- Re: Re: When does the record end?, Scott Kitterman, 16:36
- Re: Re: When does the record end?, Marc Chametzky, 16:07
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Craig Whitmore, 14:49
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Michael Parson, 14:30
- RE: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Scott Kitterman, 13:24
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Constantine A. Murenin, 13:20
- RE: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Scott Kitterman, 13:19
- Re: Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:07
- Input via the web site submission form - Just wanted to say something positive, Scott Kitterman, 12:55
- SPF-council mailing list and #spf IRC channel, wayne, 07:40
- Re: Additioanl SPF Support Volunteers Needed, wayne, 07:35
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, Greg Connor, 07:25
- Additioanl SPF Support Volunteers Needed, Scott Kitterman, 07:10
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, wayne, 06:39
- Re: dns record format, wayne, 06:23
- RE: Thanks for all the feedback on the SPF validator, Scott Kitterman, 06:03
- dns record format, Raymond Neeves, 05:24
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, spf-team, 03:36
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, Chris Haynes, 03:21
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, johnp, 03:09
- Re: Test tool for type 99, Frank Ellermann, 00:22
- Re: Thanks for all the feedback on the SPF validator, johnp, 00:06
July 19, 2005
- Thanks for all the feedback on the SPF validator, Scott Kitterman, 23:08
- RE: Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 23:03
- RE: When does the record end? was: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 22:58
- RE: Re: Test tool for type 99, Scott Kitterman, 22:47
- RE: Re: Test tool for type 99, Scott Kitterman, 22:30
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, Greg Connor, 22:13
- Re: Test tool for type 99, Frank Ellermann, 17:20
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:38
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:34
- RE: When does the record end? was: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:28
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99, wayne, 16:27
- Re: Test tool for type 99, Frank Ellermann, 16:14
- Re: MX/PTR Max Lookup error, Frank Ellermann, 15:59
- Re: Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 15:58
- RE: When does the record end? was: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 15:55
- Re: When does the record end?, Frank Ellermann, 15:42
- Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 15:33
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 15:20
- Re: Re: When does the record end?, wayne, 15:19
- Re: When does the record end? was: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, wayne, 15:14
- RE: When does the record end? was: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:00
- Re: Re: MX/PTR Max Lookup error, wayne, 14:57
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- Re: When does the record end?, Frank Ellermann, 14:43
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 14:29
- Re: MX/PTR Max Lookup error, Frank Ellermann, 14:16
- RE: Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:01
- RE: Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Dick St.Peters, 13:48
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Mark Shewmaker, 13:46
- RE: Re: Test tool for type 99 was:"/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 13:38
- RE: When does the record end? was: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 12:55
- RE: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), Scott Kitterman, 12:22
- Re: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), wayne, 12:13
- RE: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), Scott Kitterman, 12:03
- Re: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), wayne, 11:47
- Re: RE: MX/PTR Max Lookup error, wayne, 11:32
- RE: RE: MX/PTR Max Lookup error, Scott Kitterman, 11:20
- RE: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), Scott Kitterman, 11:19
- Re: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), wayne, 11:15
- RE: MX/PTR Max Lookup error, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:13
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 11:08
- RE: Re:MX/PTR Max Lookup error was( "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), Scott Kitterman, 10:58
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Mark Shewmaker, 10:49
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Arjen de Korte, 10:44
- RE: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 10:20
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:34
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, jeremy+spf, 08:14
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:44
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 00:03
July 18, 2005
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 22:55
- Re: Mail::SPF::Query, Scott Kitterman, 19:30
- Mail::SPF::Query, Craig Whitmore, 18:56
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:19
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 17:18
- one dot only (was: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?), Frank Ellermann, 15:38
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Greg Connor, 14:54
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 14:27
- RE: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 13:58
- RE: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 13:58
- RE: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:51
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 12:38
- RE: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 11:47
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 11:27
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 10:56
- RE: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 07:45
July 16, 2005
- Re: moving the spf-council mailing list, Frank Ellermann, 19:55
- Re: Re: moving the spf-council mailing list, wayne, 19:11
- Re: moving the spf-council mailing list, Frank Ellermann, 19:00
- checkfree.com SPF records: thank you, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:32
- Trend?, administrator, 07:40
July 15, 2005
- Re: slashdot article on DKIM and SenderID, wayne, 20:36
- RE: slashdot article on DKIM and SenderID, John Glube, 18:33
- Test Suite for Latest SPF Specs, Lennon - Orcon, 18:13
- Re: website problem, Frank Ellermann, 15:49
- Re: Re: website problem, Scott Kitterman, 15:43
- Re: Re: website problem, wayne, 15:05
- Re: slashdot article on DKIM and SenderID, Hector Santos, 14:56
- Re: Re: website problem, Meng Weng Wong, 14:54
- Re: slashdot article on DKIM and SenderID, Meng Weng Wong, 14:52
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 12:03
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 11:54
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 11:27
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Arjen de Korte, 11:14
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 10:50
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:39
- slashdot article on DKIM and SenderID, wayne, 09:17
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:44
- Re: Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 08:07
- Re: Re: website problem, wayne, 06:59
- Re: website problem, Frank Ellermann, 06:50
- Re: Re: website problem, wayne, 06:18
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Frank Ellermann, 05:20
- Re: website problem, Frank Ellermann, 04:58
- Re: Broken SPF, Frank Ellermann, 04:43
July 14, 2005
- Re: Re: Proposed Agenda for the next meeting:, wayne, 16:49
- Re: Proposed Agenda for the next meeting:, william(at)elan.net, 16:38
- Re: Broken SPF, Craig Whitmore, 14:10
- Re: Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Alba Regalado-Palacios, 13:35
- my fortune for today..., wayne, 12:19
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 11:38
- Re: website problem, Ralf Doeblitz, 11:31
- Re: website problem, wayne, 10:59
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Marc Chametzky, 10:59
- Re: Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, wayne, 10:57
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, wayne, 10:50
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Marc Chametzky, 10:30
- RE: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 10:09
- Re: "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Marc Chametzky, 10:01
- "/" inside an exists: domain-spec?, Scott Kitterman, 09:43
- Re: Broken SPF, Daniel Taylor, 08:34
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Dick St.Peters, 08:02
- Re: Broken SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:59
- RE: Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Scott Kitterman, 05:45
July 13, 2005
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Frank Ellermann, 22:11
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Hector Santos, 21:09
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:39
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 20:38
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:31
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:29
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 20:21
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:18
- website problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:31
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Frank Ellermann, 19:11
- Re: Broken SPF, wayne, 17:05
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Hector Santos, 16:03
- Re: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:02
- SPF Mail From Whitelist in Spam Assassin 3.1, Scott Kitterman, 11:10
- RE: Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Renato de Castro Henriques, 11:07
- Increase Yahoo.com spoofing?, Hector Santos, 10:39
- RE: Broken SPF, Scott Kitterman, 09:32
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, wayne, 07:29
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Jeroen Massar, 07:25
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, wayne, 07:03
- Re: Broken SPF, Rene Barbier, 06:53
- Re: Broken SPF, Lennon - Orcon, 01:14
July 12, 2005
- Re: Broken SPF, Rene Barbier, 23:54
- Broken SPF, Craig Whitmore, 22:39
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Frank Ellermann, 19:27
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 14:48
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 09:12
- Re: Old TXT records included by new SPF records, william(at)elan.net, 09:06
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Arjen de Korte, 08:58
- Old TXT records included by new SPF records, johnp, 08:55
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Michael Weiner, 08:54
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, johnp, 08:40
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Arjen de Korte, 08:26
- Re: Meng in the news, John Hinton, 07:35
- Re: Council log censored, Michael Hammer, 07:00
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Tim Kennedy, 06:30
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Michael Weiner, 05:56
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Julian Mehnle, 05:23
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Frank Ellermann, 05:20
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, william(at)elan.net, 05:19
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Julian Mehnle, 05:00
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Michael Weiner, 04:57
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Frank Ellermann, 04:53
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 04:43
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Julian Mehnle, 04:41
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:40
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Michael Weiner, 04:39
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, Frank Ellermann, 04:34
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Julian Mehnle, 04:34
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, william(at)elan.net, 04:32
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:29
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 04:28
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, wayne, 04:28
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Michael Weiner, 04:25
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, DNI Support Department, 04:24
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Jeroen Massar, 04:23
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 04:23
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:14
- Re: Fresh from the I-D factory, wayne, 04:11
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Julian Mehnle, 04:10
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 04:09
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, wayne, 04:07
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:07
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 04:04
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Julian Mehnle, 04:02
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 03:59
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 03:57
- Re: Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:54
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Jeroen Massar, 03:48
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 03:48
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, johnp, 03:47
- Re: Meng in the news, william(at)elan.net, 03:46
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:34
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Florian Weimer, 03:29
- Fresh from the I-D factory, Frank Ellermann, 03:28
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:26
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 03:19
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:03
- Re: Meng in the news, Julian Mehnle, 03:00
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Jeroen Massar, 02:45
- Re: Re: Council log censored, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 00:02
July 11, 2005
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, wayne, 21:56
- Re: The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, Lennon - Orcon, 21:52
- Re: Meng in the news, william(at)elan.net, 21:10
- The IANA has assigned us DNS number 99 for SPF, wayne, 20:53
- Meng in the news, wayne, 20:47
- Re: MAAWG on SPF & Sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 19:07
- Re: Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 18:45
- SPF-Help Subscribers, Scott Kitterman, 18:22
- MAAWG on SPF & Sender ID, John Glube, 14:18
- Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Florian Weimer, 08:53
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 08:14
- Re: Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 05:09
- Re: Council log censored, j o a r, 04:46
- Re: Council log censored, Jeroen Massar, 04:35
- Re: Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 04:34
- Re: DKIM submitted to the IETF?, wayne, 04:06
- DKIM submitted to the IETF?, wayne, 04:02
- Re: Re: Council log censored, william(at)elan.net, 03:25
- Re: Council log censored, william(at)elan.net, 02:51
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 02:40
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 02:20
- Re: Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 01:14
July 10, 2005
- activehost.com SPF records, Craig Whitmore, 22:03
- Re: Re: Council log censored, wayne, 21:02
- Re: Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 20:04
- Re: Updated draft-spf-6-3-options-07, Frank Ellermann, 18:55
- Re: Re: Council log censored, wayne, 18:53
- Re: Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 18:15
- Re: Council log censored, wayne, 16:51
- New SPF council member: Greg Connor, wayne, 16:42
- Re: Council log censored, wayne, 16:33
- Re: Council log censored, william(at)elan.net, 16:33
- Re: Council log censored, Julian Mehnle, 16:07
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Constantine A. Murenin, 15:55
- Council log censored, Frank Ellermann, 15:36
- Re: new ABNF for the SPF spec, Frank Ellermann, 14:52
- new ABNF for the SPF spec (Was: nailing down the CIDR length), wayne, 10:51
- Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, william(at)elan.net, 08:49
- Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Florian Weimer, 08:45
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I seeit...., David Woodhouse, 07:48
July 09, 2005
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I seeit...., Stuart D. Gathman, 11:37
- Re: Hosting Company SPF Default Setting, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:23
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I seeit...., David Woodhouse, 03:20
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 02:52
- Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Frank Ellermann, 02:22
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 02:18
- Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Commerco WebMaster, 02:02
July 08, 2005
- Re: Andy Newton reports: SPF Adoption on the Rise, Frank Ellermann, 23:44
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 23:39
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Frank Ellermann, 23:36
- Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Frank Ellermann, 23:20
- RE: Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 22:58
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Frank Ellermann, 22:50
- Re: SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, Meng Weng Wong, 22:23
- SPF spec status: in the RFC Editor's queue, wayne, 21:35
- Re: Hosting Company SPF Default Setting, Scott Kitterman, 21:26
- Re: Hosting Company SPF Default Setting, John Hinton, 15:33
- Re: Explain please, Leonard Mills, 15:10
- Re: SPF and Webmin, Julian Mehnle, 14:44
- Re: Andy Newton reports: SPF Adoption on the Rise, Hector Santos, 14:07
- Re: Hosting Company SPF Default Setting, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:44
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I seeit...., Seth Goodman, 12:56
- Re: Andy Newton reports: SPF Adoption on the Rise, johnp, 12:51
- RE: Andy Newton reports: SPF Adoption on the Rise, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:43
- Andy Newton reports: SPF Adoption on the Rise, wayne, 12:29
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Julian Mehnle, 11:49
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 11:42
- Re: Hosting Company SPF Default Setting, Daniel Taylor, 10:58
- Re: Sender ID "embraces and extends" SPF, according to Microsoft, william(at)elan.net, 10:34
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 10:29
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, wayne, 10:27
- Hosting Company SPF Default Setting, John Hinton, 10:27
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 10:23
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Julian Mehnle, 10:16
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, johnp, 10:11
- Re: Sender ID "embraces and extends" SPF, according to Microsoft, Julian Mehnle, 10:10
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, william(at)elan.net, 10:01
- Re: Explain please, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:00
- Re: Explain please, wayne, 09:48
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, wayne, 09:44
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Julian Mehnle, 09:43
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:38
- Re: Explain please, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:31
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Julian Mehnle, 09:25
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:07
- Re: Explain please, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:01
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Julian Mehnle, 08:57
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Julian Mehnle, 08:43
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 08:37
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 08:36
- Re: Explain please, Bruce Barnes, 08:24
- Re: Explain please, johnp, 08:21
- Re: Explain please, Michael Hammer, 08:14
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 08:14
- RE: Explain please, Dan Field, 08:11
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 08:06
- Re: Explain please, wayne, 08:04
- Re: Explain please, johnp, 07:58
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 07:45
- Re: Explain please, Bruce Barnes, 07:38
- Re: Explain please, johnp, 07:20
- Re: Explain please, william(at)elan.net, 07:17
- Re: Explain please, wayne, 07:10
- RE: (SPF-Pass) Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 07:09
- RE: (SPF-Pass) Re: Explain please, Bruce Barnes, 06:53
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 06:53
- RE: Explain please, Mark, 06:49
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 06:46
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 06:37
- Re: Explain please, johnp, 06:27
- Re: Explain please, johnp, 06:23
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 06:17
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 06:17
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 06:14
- Re: Explain please, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:13
- Re: Explain please, william(at)elan.net, 06:10
- Re: Explain please, wayne, 06:03
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 06:02
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 06:00
- Re: Explain please, Julian Mehnle, 05:59
- Re: Explain please, Julian Mehnle, 05:52
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 05:49
- Re: Explain please, william(at)elan.net, 05:38
- Re: Explain please, wayne, 05:19
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 05:09
- Re: Explain please, wayne, 05:03
- nailing down the CIDR length (Was: Broken SPF Records), wayne, 04:54
- Re: Explain please, Julian Mehnle, 04:42
- Re: Know thy forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 04:40
- More SPF statistic, Hector Santos, 04:03
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:33
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 02:12
- Re: That Forwarding Topic Again, Greg Connor, 00:24
- Re: Re: Council Meeting 10 July 2005, 6pm EST, Greg Connor, 00:18
- Re: Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Greg Connor, 00:02
July 07, 2005
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 22:58
- Re: Re: Broken SPF Records, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:18
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 17:03
- Re: Re: Broken SPF Records, Craig Whitmore, 16:59
- Re: Re: Broken SPF Records, wayne, 16:30
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 16:28
- Re: Broken SPF Records, Frank Ellermann, 16:16
- Re: Broken SPF Records, Craig Whitmore, 15:57
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Seth Goodman, 15:53
- Re: Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, wayne, 15:37
- Re: Re: Broken SPF Records, Craig Whitmore, 15:29
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 15:26
- Re: Broken SPF Records, wayne, 15:24
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, wayne, 15:19
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Seth Goodman, 15:16
- Re: Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:09
- Re: Broken SPF Records, Frank Ellermann, 14:56
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 14:42
- Re: Broken SPF Records, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 14:30
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 14:27
- Re: Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:20
- Re: Broken SPF Records, Craig Whitmore, 14:11
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 14:09
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Andy Bakun, 13:54
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Frank Ellermann, 13:49
- Broken SPF Records, Craig Whitmore, 13:37
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:37
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, wayne, 13:27
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Lou Katz, 13:14
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:56
- Re: Re: Council Meeting 10 July 2005, 6pm EST, william(at)elan.net, 10:44
- Re: Re: Council Meeting 10 July 2005, 6pm EST, Chuck Mead, 10:35
- Re: Council Meeting 10 July 2005, 6pm EST, william(at)elan.net, 10:30
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 09:46
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 09:40
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 09:29
- Re: State of the SPF website, David MacQuigg, 08:40
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, wayne, 08:35
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, wayne, 08:29
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dick St.Peters, 08:11
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 07:53
- In regards to threads "Forwading/Redirecting" and "Explain please", william(at)elan.net, 07:37
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 07:33
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 07:20
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 07:03
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 07:00
- Re: Explain please, John Hinton, 06:54
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 06:52
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 06:48
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 06:20
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 05:37
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 05:22
- Re: Explain please, Terry Fielder, 05:19
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Peter M. Abraham, 03:02
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 02:53
- OT: European Parliament Rejects Software Patents, william(at)elan.net, 01:39
- Re: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 01:30
- RE: SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Allyn Wade, 01:02
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 00:56
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 00:52
- SPF Validation Tools - Yet Another One, Scott Kitterman, 00:30
- Re: Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, David Woodhouse, 00:05
July 06, 2005
- Re: Explain please, Graham Murray, 23:07
- Re: Looks like GoDaddy's SPF record is fixed, wayne, 22:15
- Looks like GoDaddy's SPF record is fixed, Scott Kitterman, 22:09
- Re: Explain please, Scott Kitterman, 19:19
- RE: That Forwarding Topic Again, Scott Kitterman, 18:40
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Frank Ellermann, 18:24
- Re: Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 17:42
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Frank Ellermann, 17:27
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Frank Ellermann, 16:50
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 16:42
- Re: Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:32
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 16:17
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Frank Ellermann, 16:16
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Frank Ellermann, 15:51
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I seeit...., Craig Whitmore, 15:23
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:22
- Re: Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 15:02
- Re: posting volume, Frank Ellermann, 14:56
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dick St.Peters, 14:41
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Frank Ellermann, 14:40
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 14:29
- Re: Know thy forwarders, Scott Kitterman, 14:22
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 14:17
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 14:15
- posting volume (Was: That Forwarding Topic Again), wayne, 13:41
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 12:50
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 12:04
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 12:00
- Re: Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 11:49
- That Forwarding Topic Again, Greg Connor, 11:49
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 11:40
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 11:26
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), John Glube, 11:13
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 10:30
- RE: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Commerco WebMaster, 10:15
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., John Hinton, 10:11
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Terry Fielder, 10:03
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 10:00
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Daniel Taylor, 09:57
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Tony Finch, 09:56
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Daniel Taylor, 09:55
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Daniel Taylor, 09:52
- RE: Forwarding/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Bruce Barnes, 09:46
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 09:42
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 09:42
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:39
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 09:37
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 09:37
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:36
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, David Woodhouse, 09:34
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Daniel Taylor, 09:32
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 09:30
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:27
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 09:26
- Re: Explain please, Tony Finch, 09:25
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dick St.Peters, 09:23
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:16
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 09:13
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:59
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Terry Fielder, 08:56
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, David Woodhouse, 08:50
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:48
- RE: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 08:42
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Hannah Schroeter, 08:36
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., David Woodhouse, 08:28
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:25
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, David Woodhouse, 08:25
- RE: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Commerco WebMaster, 08:22
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dan Field, 08:12
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Hannah Schroeter, 08:09
- Re: Explain please, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:08
- Re: Explain please, Daniel Taylor, 08:06
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 08:03
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:03
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 07:57
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:57
- Re: Explain please, Daniel Taylor, 07:52
- Re: Explain please, Daniel Taylor, 07:45
- Re: Explain please, Tony Finch, 07:45
- RE: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dan Field, 07:43
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 07:42
- Re: Explain please, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:42
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., william(at)elan.net, 07:37
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dick St.Peters, 07:30
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:29
- RE: Forwarding/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Tony Finch, 07:26
- Re: Explain please, Tony Finch, 07:23
- RE: Forwarding/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dan Field, 07:21
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dick St.Peters, 07:14
- Re: Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:45
- Forwading/Redirecting: The problem as I see it...., Dan Field, 06:22
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Dick St.Peters, 06:11
- Re: Explain please, Daniel Taylor, 05:33
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Tony Finch, 03:33
- Re: Explain please, Tony Finch, 03:32
- Re: Know thy forwarders, Tony Finch, 03:29
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, David Woodhouse, 00:33
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 00:02
July 05, 2005
- Re: State of the SPF website, Frank Ellermann, 23:10
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, Greg Connor, 21:37
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Greg Connor, 21:18
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Frank Ellermann, 20:34
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:10
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:57
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, Mark Shewmaker, 19:14
- Re: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Mark Shewmaker, 18:33
- Re: Explain please, Julian Mehnle, 17:39
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, j o a r, 17:10
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Terry Fielder, 17:01
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 16:49
- Re: Explain please, David Woodhouse, 16:35
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, David Woodhouse, 16:28
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Julian Mehnle, 16:27
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 16:26
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Gunnar Hjalmarsson, 16:11
- Re: Explain please, Julian Mehnle, 16:09
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 16:02
- Re: Know thy forwarders, Julian Mehnle, 15:46
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:43
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:36
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Julian Mehnle, 15:36
- State of the SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 15:23
- Re: Conflict with challenge/response filters, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:22
- Re: Know thy forwarders (was: SPF+SRS vs. BATV), David Woodhouse, 15:16
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, Greg Connor, 15:11
- RE: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 15:10
- Specification documents for SPF, SRS, SES, BATV (was: SPF+SRS vs. BATV), Julian Mehnle, 14:58
- Re: State of the SPF website (was: SPF+SRS vs. BATV), Greg Connor, 14:51
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- Conflict with challenge/response filters, mail, 14:40
- Know thy forwarders (was: SPF+SRS vs. BATV), Julian Mehnle, 14:40
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Dave Crocker, 14:31
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Julian Mehnle, 14:12
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Greg Connor, 14:10
- RE: Explain please (Was: SPF Stats), Commerco WebMaster, 13:11
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 12:53
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 12:46
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Julian Mehnle, 11:58
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, wayne, 11:56
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 11:52
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Julian Mehnle, 11:32
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Hector Santos, 11:30
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:01
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, John Hinton, 10:53
- Automatic forwarder whitelisting negotiation (was: SPF+SRS vs. BATV), Julian Mehnle, 10:38
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 10:16
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 09:44
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:40
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 09:39
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, John Hinton, 09:31
- RE: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Scott Kitterman, 09:27
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, David Woodhouse, 09:25
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 09:23
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 09:22
- Re: where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, David Woodhouse, 09:20
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), william(at)elan.net, 09:10
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, wayne, 09:06
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 08:54
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Daniel Taylor, 08:45
- where is SES/BATV/ABBS?, wayne, 08:39
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), william(at)elan.net, 08:37
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Terry Fielder, 08:36
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 08:35
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:30
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:27
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), william(at)elan.net, 08:21
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 08:18
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 08:15
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Graham Murray, 08:04
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, wayne, 07:46
- Re: Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 07:39
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 07:36
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 07:35
- Re: Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, wayne, 07:33
- Re: Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 07:24
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 07:18
- Re: SPF Stats, wayne, 07:14
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Dick St.Peters, 07:11
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, wayne, 07:10
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 07:00
- Re: Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, wayne, 06:58
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 06:53
- Re: SPF Stats, wayne, 06:47
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Dick St.Peters, 06:45
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 06:29
- Re: Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:28
- Re: Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, David Woodhouse, 06:08
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Stuart D. Gathman, 05:57
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV, Frank Ellermann, 04:01
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), David Woodhouse, 02:56
- Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Tony Finch, 02:41
- SPF+SRS vs. BATV (was: SPF Stats), Julian Mehnle, 02:30
- RE: SPF Stats, David Woodhouse, 00:08
July 03, 2005
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Shane Rush, 14:38
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:52
- Re: SPF Stats, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:30
- Re: SPF Stats, Lennon - Orcon, 04:10
- Re: SPF Stats, j o a r, 03:51
July 02, 2005
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Hector Santos, 23:20
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Hector Santos, 22:42
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Hector Santos, 22:35
- SPF Stats, Lennon - Orcon, 17:30
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Commerco WebMaster, 16:48
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:12
- Re: non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, william(at)elan.net, 16:08
- non-SPF domains with MX SPF domains, Hector Santos, 15:36
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 15:16
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, wayne, 12:28
- RE: The reuse of SPF version 1 records, william(at)elan.net, 02:31
July 01, 2005
- Re: Border Appliances, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:18
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:49
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Julian Mehnle, 06:31
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Michael Hammer, 06:08
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 01:30
- Another attempt at showing some stats, Greg Connor, 00:09