On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Dan Field wrote:
On 06 July 2005 15:14, Dick St.Peters write:
You seem to understand the problem, but what makes you claim this
forwarding is "wrong"? RFC2821 explicitly permits it.
Well... not official wrong, but wrong in the sense that this is the
cause of a major headache for the validation of a sender.
Only if you try to use a technique that makes incorrect assumptions.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.