On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Julian Mehnle wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
What makes you suggest otherwise? Can you describe in detail the massive
changes to existing practice which you think the alternatives would need
us to make?
Do all the Qmail or Exim or Postfix or Exchange installations out there
support BATV or DKIM already? No? Thought so.
And they don't need to. They can be completely ignorant of BATV and DKIM,
and they can still successfully interoperate with servers that do
understand them. This is not the case for SPF.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.