-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
I take it you are a forwarder. If not, you shouldn't experience
any problems and/or your statement in this paragraph isn't correct.
The rest of my reply is written with above in mind.
You keep telling me that I need to change my systems in order to support
your new feature. This is *not* an "interoperable" protocol.
So, your system forwards e-mail then?
If so, how can I tell the difference between a valid forward
through your system and an outright forgery?
Answer that question and you understand my position.
- --
Daniel Taylor VP Operations Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor(_at_)vocalabs(_dot_)com http://www.vocalabs.com/
(952)941-6580x203
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCy/Ad8/QSptFdBtURAvLBAJ4jvM5LRmkSkmFcV/+9lz8IPxsIWACffzAi
tRohJ1rb3tb/AdBzA01q4sE=
=9TqW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----