-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I want a MAIL clarification [in 2821bis], "bounces to" vs. "classic",
that's so far only my idea.
What do people need to do in order to support this idea of yours?
Nothing, it's about the semantics of MAIL FROM. The "classic" fans could
use SPF / SES / BATV etc. And what "bounces to" fans do is their
problem.
I mean, would it be of any use to send comments to the IETF supporting a
clarification of MAIL FROM in 2821bis?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC07DxwL7PKlBZWjsRAkSXAJ9CtKhzyka3r+Sx+ymvq5w3yn0LiwCfaco8
Rn4g920IuNNipD+LeCKCLtM=
=gUNI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----