On 6/30/05, Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> wrote:
Right. Consider when we get around to working on spf3.0 after
a huge successful deployment of v=spf1. The installed base will want to
keep up to date on tweaks to SPF classic at the spfclassic.org site,
while openspf.org will be focused on the new developing standard.
Stuart, This makes no sense. People want a single place (portal) to go
to for official information. This is about branding and mindshare. The
more appropriate way to handle the situation you lay out is:
classic.openspf.org or openspf.org/classic/ (leaving out the www.)
As usual, just my 2 cents.
Mike