spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What to do about the SPF domain name

2005-07-28 21:13:16
On 28/07/05, wayne <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net> wrote:
What do people think about either using something like openspf.info
instead of openspf.org and hope that openspf.org never falls into the
wrong hands?

What do people think about skipping the openspf domain names and going
with the second place finisher, spf-classic.org?

I think that 'spf-classic.org' is a much better name for the
SPF-Classic specification, as opposed to openspf.org/info/com/net.

De facto, 'Open-' is reserved for the OpenBSD projects. :-) Seriously,
they have OpenBSD, OpenSSH, OpenBGPD, OpenNTPD and OpenCVS is about to
come. Let's leave it up to them to do the 'Open'-branded things, they
have most likely been the first ones to do it. ;-)

Why create more confusion if you could avoid one? Don't you think that
the fact that you cannot get hold of openspf.org might be a sign from
God that you should not use the openspf name? ;-)

P.S. I did participate in the voting, and voted for the spf-classic domains. 

Cheers,
Constantine, 
a *BSD user.