Re: SPF+SRS vs. BATV

On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 20:32 +0200, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Absolutely true.  Note, however, that they don't have to refrain from 
> rejecting on SPF "Fail" for _all_ the mail they receive, but just for
> that received from their configured forwarders.
Er, the whole point was they they can't _tell_ which mail is from
forwarders, 'configured' or otherwise. Thus the only safe answer is not
to reject for SPF failure at all.

-- 
dwmw2