spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length

2005-07-10 08:49:00
from [william(at)elan.net] [Permanent Link] 

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:


* Commerco WebMaster:


Perhaps even adding some wording like "The syntax facilitates
non-zero valid CIDR range constructs for IP4 and IP6 respectively
(e.g., 192.168.111.0/24 )."


"102.0.2.0/24", please.  This is the prefix reserved for examples.


192.0.2.0/24

But using 192.168.0.0/16 is considered perfectly reasonable as well...

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Florian Weimer
Next by Date:  new ABNF for the SPF spec (Was: nailing down the CIDR length), wayne
Previous by Thread:  Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Florian Weimer
Next by Thread:  Re: Re: nailing down the CIDR length, Florian Weimer
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]