This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Michael Weiner schreef:
Got it, thank you for that explaination :)
Writing a converter to include a TYPE99 record seems an awful lot of
waste, given the simplicity of patching BIND9 to understand the newly
assigned SPF RR:
# dig sixxs.com SPF
; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> sixxs.com SPF
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 57187
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;sixxs.com. IN SPF
;; ANSWER SECTION:
sixxs.com. 86400 IN SPF "v=spf1 -all"
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
sixxs.com. 86396 IN NS ns2.sixxs.net.
sixxs.com. 86396 IN NS ns3.sixxs.net.
sixxs.com. 86396 IN NS ns1.sixxs.net.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.sixxs.net. 172796 IN A 213.197.29.32
ns2.sixxs.net. 172796 IN A 193.109.122.62
ns3.sixxs.net. 172796 IN A 193.1.31.74
;; Query time: 79 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Jul 12 17:16:44 2005
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 162
And *yes*, this is the real output of dig... :-)
Arjen
PS The attached files will make the necessary modifications to BIND
9.3.1. The 'spf_99.[ch]' files go into the 'lib/dns/rdata/generic/'
directory and the 'bind-spf.diff' patches 'bin/tests/rdata_test.c'.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
bind-spf.diff
Description: Text document
spf_99.c
Description: Text document
spf_99.h
Description: Text document