You are correct, I meant "doesn't let us do a SPF check on their
mail", not "receives a SPF FAIL result". Poor choice of words for
a SPF list on my part.
We did email hostmaster first but did not get a response. I
can't blame them too much for that, I'm sure that address gets a lot of
non hostmaster related items sent to it. Oddly enough the SPF
discuss list seamed like a more direct way to get to the people we
needed.
Thanks everyone, it looks like we got in touch with the person
we needed.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re:
[spf-discuss] Amazon.com SPF record
From: wayne
<wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net>
Date: Mon, August 22, 2005 11:20 pm
To:
spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com (SPF discussions)
In
<20050822175736(_dot_)9cea77b9ab63029d53d9cced8db53358(_dot_)6e02374947(_dot_)wbe(_at_)email(_dot_)email(_dot_)secureserver(_dot_)net>
Brad Owen <bowen(_at_)godaddy(_dot_)com> writes:
> The " in the DNS
record is causing checks to fail.
Others have correctly pointed
out that their records won't cause an
SPF FAIL, but I think you mean
that "fail" as in "doesn't do what
they
intend".
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy
Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe,
change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Sender Policy Framework:
http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com