Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
But I do not believe that SPF and Sender-ID conflict in any
way whatsoever and this was accepted by the WG
What you believe is your business, but this was never accepted
by the WG, because it's plain wrong, see also reference [12]
in the appeal:
http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/senderid-appeal.htm#r12
The complete thread (starting in mxcomp) is very interesting:
http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/thread=8111
Bye, Frank