spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2005-08-26 16:11:25
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

On another topic:
 
Is it reasonable for my SPF checker to go ahead and check
for spf2.0 with an mfrom scope?

Yes, http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/senderid-appeal.htm#r21

But be careful with unknown modifiers, this could be a
positional modifier (something you won't find in v=spf1).

See chapter 3.3 in senderid-core, just above the erroneous
and appealed chapter 3.4
                            Bye, Frank


-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>