Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith re

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

> Once that boundary is defined the definition is fair game for
> any party to use to interpret it to meet their operational
> needs.
The boundaries are different and incompatible for spf2.0/mfrom
(roughly te same as v=spf1) and spf2.0/pra.  That's the point
of the appeal, replace one occurence of "pra,mfrom" by "mfrom"
in chapter 3.4 "backwards compatibility".

Have you ever seen an RfC claiming that you can interpret MD5
as truncated SHA because after all they are both only hashes ?

                         Bye, Frank