Seth Goodman wrote:
my advice is that implementing SRV at this stage is premature
?!? David was talking with a DNS service provider (or rather
a start-up in a very early stage). It's IMO perfectly okay to
support SRV records and other record types up to to the new SPF
type 99. SRV is not only used for CSV.
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com