In <200509030047(_dot_)21558(_dot_)julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> Julian Mehnle
<julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> writes:
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
this mailing list is about to be re-purposed. While spf-project will
still be covering project management issues, the SPF council has
decided
When did the SPF council decide this? I can find no record of
spf-project even being discussed by the SPF council.
There was no formal decision, but search your #spf logs. Do you really
think a formal decision is required?
I'm not sure that there needs to be a formal decision from the SPF
council, but I do think that if the SPF council has never even
discussed the issue that you shouldn't say "the SPF council has
decided ...".
I don't think it is a good idea because I don't think there is enough
traffic to justify splitting spf-discuss.
I think that the productive technical discussions on spf-discuss have
subsided exactly due to the large amounts of management and political
discussions on that list.
I disagree, and you are the only one pushing for this. We have *LOTS*
of stuff to do that I think is far more important that the busy-work
that will be created in trying to split this list.
You found time to do this, but you never found time to send something
to spf-announce about the appeal?
/me boggles
Just like the appeal, now that you have started this, you are going to
force a whole long discussion that others will have to participate
in. Ugh.
Yeah, I am really unhappy about this unilateral decision on your part.
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com