spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach

2005-09-06 03:09:02
The problem is that RFC2821 explicitly forbids this.  The parameter
for EHLO _MUST_ be the primary name.

um, slightly different but effectivly the same issue. our company has two smtp servers, using different ip's, both HELO using just mydomain.com, their actual names are server1.mydomain.com and server2.mydomain.com, the mx entries for mydomain.com point to both server1 (10) and server2 (20).

mydomain.com doesn't have an A record, just an MX (that points to server1 and server2) record, shouldn't you look up the MX record of the EHLO if an A record is not found? or really you should lookup the MX record first and then fall back to the A record, if you did that then you would resolve your issue.

you could then EHLO as jupiter.org and so long as the MX record pointed to all three servers/ip's it would be valid.

or am i missing something?
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>