spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Question on a unified policy record approach

2005-09-06 06:37:25
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:09:46PM +0100, paddy wrote:

granted, but it does not replace the check of a ptr which has potential
to curb forgery the other way around.

What are you trying to prove?  I think you are mixing up technologies.

Is their a reason why the PTRs for 10.{1,2,3}.0.1 could or should not 
all resolve to a single name ?

Yes.  And this depends on the situation.  You cannot count on it
either way as both situations can be valid.

But as I said before: this doesn't matter.  The example I gave doesn't
need _any_ lookup of hostnames.

Alex

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>