spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?

2005-12-01 12:15:54
"Dick2" == Dick St Peters
"Re: Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?"
 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:43:26 -0500

    Dick2> John A. Martin writes:
    >> >>>>> "Dick" == Dick St Peters "Re: Re[2]: Bounce-Spam and
    >> >>>>> SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?"
    >> >>>>>  Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:35:29 -0500
    >>
    Dick> If you don't like bogus bounces, implement SRS or SES for
    Dick> all your outgoing mail.

    >> And with Postfix?

    Dick2> http://www.libsrs2.org/docs/mta-users.html sayss there's a
    Dick2> patch for Postfix.

<http://www.libsrs2.org/status.html> says 'postfix-libsrs2
DEVELOPMENT' is broken.

And as for SES with Postfix, I see no clue at
<http://ses.codeshare.ca/> or elsewhere.

What am I missing?

        jam

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: pgprpPnKaUvY7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, John A. Martin <=