SPF Discuss (date)
December 31, 2005
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:56
- [spf-discuss] Mail::SPF::Query 1.998, Julian Mehnle, 18:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 06:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Arjen de Korte, 05:41
December 30, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 22:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Scott Kitterman, 14:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Arjen de Korte, 14:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 14:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Arjen de Korte, 07:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Gary Faith, 06:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Koen Martens, 03:00
December 29, 2005
- [spf-discuss] <toplabel> (was: Empty MX name), Frank Ellermann, 23:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: Empty MX name, Frank Ellermann, 23:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Frank Ellermann, 22:49
- [spf-discuss] Community Vote: Council Election Procedures -- Vote now! (Reminder), Julian Mehnle, 16:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Julian Mehnle, 16:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Marty Godsey, 15:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Julian Mehnle, 15:59
- [spf-discuss] "In other words, it's fairly easy to get SPF wrong. ", Mark Holm, 15:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, wayne, 11:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Julian Mehnle, 11:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Tony Finch, 11:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 11:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, wayne, 10:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Terry Fielder, 09:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: Empty MX name, John A. Martin, 09:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 09:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 09:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Theo Schlossnagle, 08:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Terry Fielder, 08:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, william(at)elan.net, 08:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Terry Fielder, 08:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Dick St.Peters, 07:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Theo Schlossnagle, 07:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Julian Mehnle, 02:25
December 28, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 23:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 23:18
- [spf-discuss] Empty MX name, Stuart D. Gathman, 23:08
- [spf-discuss] Legal success against spammer, Chris Haynes, 08:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF problem with pobox.com that I don't understand, David Gravereaux, 02:01
December 21, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: FYI: FTC REPORTS VOLUME OF SPAM DOWN, Frank Ellermann, 21:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] FYI: FTC REPORTS VOLUME OF SPAM DOWN, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] FYI: FTC REPORTS VOLUME OF SPAM DOWN, william(at)elan.net, 15:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] FYI: FTC REPORTS VOLUME OF SPAM DOWN, Dick St.Peters, 15:28
- [spf-discuss] FYI: FTC REPORTS VOLUME OF SPAM DOWN, Hector Santos, 15:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] FYI: FTC AND CANADIAN COMP BUREAU TO UNVEIL ANTI-SPAM INITIATIVE, Jason Gurtz, 12:16
- [spf-discuss] Using macro expansion to blacklist selected addresses, Kurt Andersen, 11:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF setup and recursion, dejanspf, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF setup and recursion, Marc Chametzky, 10:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF setup and recursion, dejanspf, 09:41
- [spf-discuss] SPF setup and recursion, Chibra Iheakaram, 09:22
December 09, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Double SPF1 records, Hector Santos, 23:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Double SPF1 records, Stuart D. Gathman, 22:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: For SPF Council review: proposed resolution, Frank Ellermann, 18:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 17:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 17:42
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 16:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Michael Elliott, 15:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 15:15
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Bob Braden, 14:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 14:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 14:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 13:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Michael Elliott, 13:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 13:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 12:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Sam Hartman, 12:25
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Andrew W. Donoho, 11:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 10:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 10:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 08:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 08:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 08:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] links to the old website (Was: DMA and spf.pobox.com), Scott Kitterman, 07:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dick St.Peters, 06:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 06:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 06:42
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 06:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, william(at)elan.net, 05:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] links to the old website (Was: DMA and spf.pobox.com), Arjen de Korte, 01:14
December 08, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Pekka Savola, 23:50
- [spf-discuss] DSN re forgery gets someones attention, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:33
- [spf-discuss] links to the old website (Was: DMA and spf.pobox.com), wayne, 18:10
- [spf-discuss] For SPF Council review: proposed resolution, Frank Ellermann, 16:19
- [spf-discuss] Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 about to expire on 2005-12-08, Frank Ellermann, 15:23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 15:15
- [spf-discuss] RE: [spf-council] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Mark, 14:39
- [spf-discuss] Why is SenderID an experiement?, wayne, 14:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd), Frank Ellermann, 13:26
- [spf-discuss] Re: Outcome of the IESG appeals, Frank Ellermann, 13:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: another style of dns records, Frank Ellermann, 12:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: Outcome of the IESG appeals, Frank Ellermann, 12:15
- [spf-discuss] IAB appeal (was: Outcome of the IESG appeals), Frank Ellermann, 11:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: another style of dns records, wayne, 10:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: another style of dns records, Frank Ellermann, 10:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Julian Mehnle, 10:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, John Hinton, 10:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Jeff Macdonald, 09:41
- [spf-discuss] SenderID *CANNOT* become an Internet Standard, wayne, 09:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] another style of dns records, wayne, 08:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, william(at)elan.net, 08:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Dotzero, 08:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, wayne, 08:03
- [spf-discuss] another style of dns records, Agri, 07:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Mark, 07:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Julian Mehnle, 06:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, wayne, 06:33
- [spf-discuss] Outcome of the IESG appeals, Julian Mehnle, 06:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 06:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Final edits to draft-schlitt-spf-classic?, wayne, 05:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd), wayne, 05:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 05:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 about to expire on 2005-12-08, wayne, 05:34
- [spf-discuss] Final edits to draft-schlitt-spf-classic?, Julian Mehnle, 05:17
- [spf-discuss] Re: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822 (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 05:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Mark, 04:56
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 04:07
December 07, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] How to implement spf in sendmail, Manish Bali, 22:30
- [spf-discuss] draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 about to expire on 2005-12-08, Julian Mehnle, 15:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, Julian Mehnle, 11:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, Jeff Macdonald, 08:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, william(at)elan.net, 04:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, Julian Mehnle, 04:50
December 06, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: Whats to make with this?, Frank Ellermann, 19:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, Frank Ellermann, 19:37
- [spf-discuss] The SPF website has moved to http://www.openspf.org, Julian Mehnle, 15:17
- [spf-discuss] DMA and spf.pobox.com, Jeff Macdonald, 08:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Whats to make with this?, Hector Santos, 05:11
- [spf-discuss] Strange result from wizard needs investigating, Scott Kitterman, 03:15
December 01, 2005
- [spf-discuss] SPF Discussion & Google, David Lawless, 18:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, John A. Martin, 12:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF, SES, and AOL, Jeff Macdonald, 11:56
- [spf-discuss] SPF, SES, and AOL, Daniel Taylor, 11:43
- RE: [spf-discuss] How to implement spf in sendmail, G.D.S.Marshall, 00:00