"Frank" == Frank Ellermann <nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>
writes:
Frank> Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> Some folks including me were surprised that there's no "IETF
>>> last call" for experimental RFCs, unless they are the product
>>> of an IETF WG (4.2.3).
>> That's actually not true. The responsible AD can issue a last
>> call for an experimental draft.
Frank> Where do I miss that provision in 2026, is it something
Frank> covered by chapter 9 (variance procedure) ?
It's certainly current IESG procedure that we can last call
informationals and experimentals. I don't know that 2026 does or
needs to say anything about it. Unless it is forbidden it seems like
a reasonable decision making tool for the IESG to apply in some cases.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com