spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

2005-12-09 17:42:36
In <200512092141(_dot_)NAA00720(_at_)gra(_dot_)isi(_dot_)edu> Bob Braden 
<braden(_at_)ISI(_dot_)EDU> writes:

This thread has contained several suggestions that publication of
an RFC in the Experimental category constitutes an "IETF experiment".

This is, in part, due to the directions of the IESG.  For example, the
IESG note that will be placed at the top of these drafts refer to
things like a two year observation period.  So, while there isn't
anything in RFC2026 that documents what the IESG has requested, I
don't think the "experiment" term is being thrown around quite as
loosely as might first seem.

Still, I think you are correct that this is not your typical
"experimental" RFC process and people should be careful not to read
too much into the term.


-wayne

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com