On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:02:22AM -0600, wayne wrote:
But, I want to be clear, I don't think this note hurts us
significantly. It is really quite minor. I just don't think we had a
net gain from it.
The way I see it, the appeal results have made it clear that MS can't make
SenderID a Standard without making changes, while SPF could be made a
Standard.
Or did I imagine that?
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com