In <200512081104(_dot_)09113(_dot_)julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> Julian Mehnle
<julian(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> writes:
"Note that the Sender ID experiment may use DNS records which may have been
created for the current SPF experiment or earlier versions in this set of
experiments. Depending on the content of the record, this may mean that
Sender-ID heuristics would be applied incorrectly to a message. Depending on
the actions associated by the recipient with those heuristics, the message
may not be delivered or may be discarded on receipt.
Participants relying on Sender ID experiment DNS records are warned that
they may lose valid messages in this set of circumstances. Participants
publishing SPF experiment DNS records should consider the advice given in
section 3.4 of RFC XXXX (draft-lyon-senderid-core) and may wish to publish
both v=spf1 and v=spf2.0 records to avoid the conflict."
Ugh.
So, what we got out of this appeal is a note in the SPF draft blessing
the opt-out requirement in the SenderID drafts. I can't see how this
helps us at all, and may well hurt.
Oh well. Maybe now the IESG block on the SPF I-Ds will be cleared all
we have lost is time.
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com