On 12/8/05, wayne <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net> wrote:
Ugh.
So, what we got out of this appeal is a note in the SPF draft blessing
the opt-out requirement in the SenderID drafts. I can't see how this
helps us at all, and may well hurt.
Oh well. Maybe now the IESG block on the SPF I-Ds will be cleared all
we have lost is time.
This certainly lowers my opinion of IESG in terms of technical quality
and fairness. This does imply that if someone else comes along with an
experimental draft that abuses SenderID in a like fashion, IESG should
be ok with that.
Mike
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com