Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
<snip>
Legalistic reason: "MX 0 ." is illegal because "." is not a valid
FQDN, at
least not for what is generally considered an FQDN by the SPF
specification.
Yahoo believes that a "NULL MX" means the following:
http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-delany-nullmx/
I'd tend to agree.
Hmmm. Isn't that a violation of some RFC? Because allowing a domain to
send but never receive means that there is no recourse for abuse@
postmaster@ etc. Indeed, not even anywhere to send DSN's...
Perhaps I am missing something, please set me straight. :)
Terry
--
Terry Fielder
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
Fax: (416) 441-9085
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com