In
<17305(_dot_)36224(_dot_)584090(_dot_)853821(_at_)saint(_dot_)heaven(_dot_)net>
"Dick St.Peters" <stpeters(_at_)NetHeaven(_dot_)com> writes:
Julian Mehnle writes:
As my appeal[1] pointed out, at the time draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 was
submitted for experimental status, there was no "running code" that
actually interpreted "v=spf1" as "spf2.0/mfrom,pra".
Perhaps you shouldn't have said that. Sendmail's sid-milter has used
v=spf1 records for PRA checks since its initial release in August
2004. I don't know the date for draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, but I
believe it was well after August.
draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 was released on Sept 15th 2004, after the
consensus of the working group was that the SPFv1 records should not
be reused for SenderID. So, yeah, there was a few weeks where the
Sendmail milter was within spec.
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com