Dick St.Peters wrote:
Dick's idea "let's ignore %{h}" is certainly interesting. ;-)
This was NOT my idea.
Don't worry, I know precisely whose idea that originally was,
but I didn't find the thread where Mark Lentczner and others
discussed it here for the post-MARID emergency v=spf1 draft.
never paraphrase what you think people said.
I'll handle that as it pleases me. You said that s single
record for HELO and MAIL FROM is as silly as a single record
for MAIL FROM and PRA. And similar assumptions led to the
temporary removal of %{h} in Mark's emergency draft. IIRC
William and I supported this, maybe you also did. Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com