spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Last changes to draft-schlitt-spf-classic

2006-01-12 16:08:28
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Ellermann wrote:
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
One thing that needs to be fixed is the language about giving a
PermError if the TXT and SPF (type99) records don't match.  As we
realized after we got the new RR number, these records can get out of
sync and there is nothing we can do to prevent that.  Such a change is
*not* an editorial change and I will need to go back to the IETF Area
Director (Ted Hardie) and/or the IESG and make sure such a change is
ok.  Or, at least, that's what Andy Newton recommended that I do.

[...]
<rant> I always wanted "take whatever you get after asking for
SPF first" without attempts to check that it's identical if you
get both.  But allegedly some anonymous 'DNS gurus' demanded it.

Came along Florian and said 'bull'.  Who were the 'DNS gurus' ?

I think I was one of them, and no, I didn't think of asynchronous TTL 
expiry at the time.  I am sorry for not thinking far enough.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxuE/wL7PKlBZWjsRAp8IAJ4tyKjtWMBiHffawVTXGczMjhvYegCgqkBr
Mqo0ZSCfyIXkwUhHVoVqfIg=
=bNWm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com