Julian Mehnle wrote:
Nor me, it was just instinct that I thought "it should not
be the receiver's problem if the sender somehow screws up."
Are you by implication arguing against PermError now?
No, PermError is a similar issue, sender screwed up, receiver
found the problem, and says "599 broken SPF, fix it, TTYL".
In the case of TXT != SPF the receiver would unnecessarily
look for trouble, that's a difference from syntax errors or
"typos" (only the sender knows this) in include / redirect=.
It's still okay to evaluate left to right as far as you get,
error or match.
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com