On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, wayne wrote:
...I seriously doubt we should grant global edit access on the website to
any spf-discuss subscriber. There needs to be _some_ quality assurance.
Everyone is very welcome to submit material for review and inclusion by
the webmasters team, though!
I strongly disagree. I think wikis have shown that the vast majority
of people are very reasonable and do a good job of editing stuff, if
they can. I think there are enough people around who will monitor the
SPF wiki that vandalism won't be a big problem. I think the lack of
progress on the new website is *FAR* more of a problem than any
"quality assurance" problems we might have.
I agree. We should learn from wikipedia - despite some occasional
vandalism issues, it is very successfull because its open.
I would however say that it may make more sense to have a system
that its those that are subscribed to spf-webmasters that can edit
website (rather then all those at spf-discuss).
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com