On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:18:49AM +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Note that not all candidates have posted platform statements [...]
...which I find surprising. Candidates, especially Meng, I am interested
in your thoughts about where the project should go. Could you please post
at least a paragraph or two about your ideas?
I have been nominated and I have accepted. However, I have choosen
to not run a campaign.
First of all: I have been on holiday, I did not think I should have to
spend much time on the computer. Time off is good IMHO. But I'm back
now and am slowly going through all mail and the spf-helpers queue.
Why should I be in the council? Well, frankly because there may be
a position to fill and nobody is willing to do the job. In other
words: don't vote me #1 please.
If elected, I will participate and contribute whenever it is required.
I think the SPF community as a whole should determine what to do next,
and how to do it; I view the council as a steering commity, needing
input from spf-discuss. As such, my personal views do not matter for
the council elections.
Regards,
Alex
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com