william(at)elan.net wrote:
from private email I sent regarding this an hour ago
Did you by chance inform them that adding v=spf1 and spf2.0/pra
into one category "SPF/SenderID" results in a strange mixture
of 2821 and 2822 policies ? Especially if they want to compare
deployment of SPF and DKIM that might be not what they want:
It's okay to have all of SPF + PRA + DKIM on one domain. Maybe
both PRA + DKIM is a bit odd. DKIM should work better with 1123
5.3.6(a) forwarding. For 5.3.6(b) PRA + DKIM have known issues.
Only SPF is perfectly happy with any kind of 5.3.6(b) or worse.
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com