SPF Discuss (date)
February 28, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Backscatter auto-complaints, John Kelly, 22:09
- [spf-discuss] Backscatter auto-complaints, Chris Drake, 21:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, John Kelly, 21:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Julian Mehnle, 18:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Dick St.Peters, 15:35
- RE: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:28
- FW: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Seth Goodman, 13:22
- RE: [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Seth Goodman, 13:13
- [spf-discuss] Immediate reject of invalid RCPT, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Mark Shewmaker, 10:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Mark Shewmaker, 10:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Terry Fielder, 09:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Hannah Schroeter, 09:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Setting up SPF on Yahoo, Scott Kitterman, 09:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Setting up SPF on Yahoo, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Setting up SPF on Yahoo, Scott Kitterman, 07:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Dick St.Peters, 06:37
- [spf-discuss] Setting up SPF on Yahoo, Erwin Kodiat, 03:02
February 27, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Scott Kitterman, 22:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Scott Kitterman, 17:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Matthew.van.Eerde, 17:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 17:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Scott Kitterman, 17:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 16:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Julian Mehnle, 16:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Julian Mehnle, 16:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Mark Shewmaker, 16:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 16:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Mark Shewmaker, 16:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Julian Mehnle, 15:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Julian Mehnle, 15:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 15:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 13:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Dick St.Peters, 13:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 12:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Dick St.Peters, 12:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, John Kelly, 12:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Daniel Taylor, 12:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Julian Mehnle, 11:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Scott Kitterman, 11:09
- [spf-discuss] Mail Forwarding Question, Stephan Golux, 10:13
February 25, 2006
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Hector Santos, 17:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, no direct replies, 17:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Hector Santos, 16:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 16:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, no direct replies, 15:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Hector Santos, 15:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 14:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Julian Mehnle, 13:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Scott Kitterman, 12:26
- [spf-discuss] Promoting NEUTRAL or SOFTFAIL result to FAIL, Hector Santos, 12:17
February 23, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Mail-SPF-Query-1.999, Steven F Siirila, 13:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: sid-milter, John Kelly, 03:27
- [spf-discuss] Re: sid-milter, Frank Ellermann, 03:19
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 02:48
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), william(at)elan.net, 02:43
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 02:36
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), william(at)elan.net, 02:24
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 02:17
- [spf-discuss] sid-milter, John Kelly, 01:43
February 22, 2006
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Peter Bowyer, 23:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: Sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 23:40
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Scott Kitterman, 18:24
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 18:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Could there be a trusted-forwarder solution to Sender ID?, Scott Kitterman, 17:54
- [spf-discuss] Could there be a trusted-forwarder solution to Sender ID?, no direct replies, 17:39
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Scott Kitterman, 17:27
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Mark Shewmaker, 17:26
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 16:54
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Dick St.Peters, 16:54
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Scott Kitterman, 16:43
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 16:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Mark Shewmaker, 16:29
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Scott Kitterman, 16:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Michael Elliott, 16:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 15:46
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 15:27
- RE: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Matthew.van.Eerde, 15:24
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Stuart D. Gathman, 15:18
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Stuart D. Gathman, 15:14
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 15:13
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 14:59
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), no direct replies, 14:57
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Dick St.Peters, 13:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Michael Elliott, 13:44
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Terry Fielder, 13:17
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 13:09
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), william(at)elan.net, 13:05
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 12:57
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), John Kelly, 12:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 12:17
- RE: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Matthew.van.Eerde, 10:50
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), no direct replies, 09:48
- Re: Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Scott Kitterman, 09:39
- Sender ID (was Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy), Dick St.Peters, 09:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Microsoft's spf record format, Jeff Macdonald, 08:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Dick St.Peters, 07:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Microsoft's spf record format, dejanspf, 06:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Terry Fielder, 05:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Microsoft's spf record format, Rene Barbier, 03:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, paddy, 03:37
- [spf-discuss] Microsoft's spf record format, Benny Chandra, 03:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 01:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, no direct replies, 00:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Mark Shewmaker, 00:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Frank Ellermann, 00:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 00:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Mark Shewmaker, 00:00
February 21, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 23:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 23:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Mark Shewmaker, 23:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 22:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: nobody @ xyzzy, Frank Ellermann, 21:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, Scott Kitterman, 19:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 18:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, Scott Kitterman, 18:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, Scott Kitterman, 18:26
- RE: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, Matthew.van.Eerde, 17:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, Matthew.van.Eerde, 17:54
- [spf-discuss] nobody @ xyzzy, John Kelly, 17:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 13:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 11:31
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 06:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, paddy, 06:17
February 18, 2006
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Hector Santos, 16:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, paddy, 10:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Mark Shewmaker, 10:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, paddy, 10:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Frank Ellermann, 08:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Hector Santos, 07:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:39
- [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Frank Ellermann, 07:21
February 17, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, no direct replies, 20:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, Hector Santos, 19:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, Hector Santos, 19:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, no direct replies, 19:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, Hector Santos, 19:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Using CBV, no direct replies, 18:55
- [spf-discuss] Using CBV, Hector Santos, 18:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, no direct replies, 17:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Hector Santos, 16:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, paddy, 16:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, paddy, 16:02
- RE: [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, Beach Computers, 14:54
- RE: [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, william(at)elan.net, 14:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, Scott Kitterman, 14:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, Beach Computers, 13:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, Scott Kitterman, 13:44
- RE: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, Imran Hussain, 13:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Frank Ellermann, 13:36
- [spf-discuss] Local SPF tool, Beach Computers, 13:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Ralf Doeblitz, 13:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:59
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 11:21
- RE: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 11:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, william(at)elan.net, 10:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, paddy, 07:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, paddy, 06:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 03:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, no direct replies, 00:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 00:13
February 16, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, no direct replies, 23:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 22:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, william(at)elan.net, 21:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Mark Shewmaker, 21:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Mark Shewmaker, 21:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, william(at)elan.net, 21:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, william(at)elan.net, 21:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Mark Shewmaker, 20:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 20:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 19:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Mark Shewmaker, 19:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 19:01
- [spf-discuss] Re: Fw: SRS vs BATV, Frank Ellermann, 18:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Mark Shewmaker, 18:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] How does SPF prevent forgery?, Terry Fielder, 17:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] How does SPF prevent forgery?, Terry Fielder, 17:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] How does SPF prevent forgery?, WebMaster, 15:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] How does SPF prevent forgery?, Wally Winchester, 15:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] How does SPF prevent forgery?, Terry Fielder, 15:36
- [spf-discuss] How does SPF prevent forgery?, Wally Winchester, 15:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 14:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, no direct replies, 13:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, william(at)elan.net, 13:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 13:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 13:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, william(at)elan.net, 12:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Dick St.Peters, 09:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, paddy, 05:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fw: SRS vs BATV, Craig Whitmore, 00:31
February 12, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 22:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Scott Kitterman, 22:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Scott Kitterman, 22:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 21:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 19:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: other modifiers, Frank Ellermann, 19:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] other modifiers (was: "redirect=" vs. other modifiers (was: New SPF Versions)), Scott Kitterman, 16:22
- [spf-discuss] "redirect=" vs. other modifiers (was: New SPF Versions), Frank Ellermann, 15:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Versions, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Versions, Scott Kitterman, 09:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Versions, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:12
February 11, 2006
- [spf-discuss] New SPF Versions, Scott Kitterman, 22:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 15:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, william(at)elan.net, 11:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: multiple HELOs, Frank Ellermann, 08:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] multiple HELOs, Julian Mehnle, 07:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] multiple HELOs, Constantine A. Murenin, 05:53
February 10, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] multiple HELOs, Julian Mehnle, 20:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 20:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, Hector Santos, 12:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, william(at)elan.net, 11:36
- [spf-discuss] The Appeal is out. So whats next for SPF?, Hector Santos, 11:07
- [spf-discuss] multiple HELOs, paddy, 07:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal page, Julian Mehnle, 02:01
February 08, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 19:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Constantine A. Murenin, 19:13
- [spf-discuss] Great Work., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 18:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 18:09
- [spf-discuss] Mail::SPF::Query 1.999, Julian Mehnle, 17:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Frank Ellermann, 16:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Julian Mehnle, 15:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Leslie Daigle, 15:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Julian Mehnle, 15:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Julian Mehnle, 15:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 15:21
- [spf-discuss] Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 15:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Mark Shewmaker, 14:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Mark Shewmaker, 14:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Spfdiscuss Sub, 13:58
- [spf-discuss] Re: IAB appeal draft, Frank Ellermann, 13:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, william(at)elan.net, 13:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Hector Santos, 13:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Constantine A. Murenin, 13:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Julian Mehnle, 13:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Preparing the IAB appeal, Julian Mehnle, 12:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 12:19
- [spf-discuss] Re: IAB appeal draft, Frank Ellermann, 11:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 11:42
- [spf-discuss] Re[2]: Preparing the IAB appeal, Kurt Andersen, 11:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Hector Santos, 11:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Hector Santos, 11:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT rant (was: Preparing the IAB appeal), Hector Santos, 11:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, william(at)elan.net, 11:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, David Sowder, 11:15
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 10:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 10:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Preparing the IAB appeal, Julian Mehnle, 10:08
- [spf-discuss] OT rant (was: Preparing the IAB appeal), Frank Ellermann, 10:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Preparing the IAB appeal, Julian Mehnle, 09:48
- [spf-discuss] IAB appeal draft, Julian Mehnle, 09:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Hector Santos, 07:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 07:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Terry Fielder, 06:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 06:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal, Frank Ellermann, 06:33
February 07, 2006
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 22:23
- [spf-discuss] Preparing the IAB appeal, Julian Mehnle, 19:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal Question, Constantine A. Murenin, 16:46
- [spf-discuss] Summary of opinions (yes/no) on IAB appeal issue, william(at)elan.net, 09:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: IAB Appeal motion carries, Frank Ellermann, 09:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal Question, Jeff Macdonald, 08:22
- [spf-discuss] IAB Appeal motion carries, william(at)elan.net, 07:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] To appeal or not to appeal? SUMMARY, Terry Fielder, 06:31
- RE: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] To appeal or not to appeal? SUMMARY, Stuart D. Gathman, 05:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] To appeal or not to appeal? SUMMARY, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:27
- RE: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Mark, 00:54
February 06, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Graham Murray, 23:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal Question, Frank Ellermann, 23:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal Question, John Hinton, 23:12
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Frank Ellermann, 22:55
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal Question, Frank Ellermann, 22:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF-council IRC logs for 2006-02-04, Frank Ellermann, 22:17
- [spf-discuss] Appeal Question, John Hinton, 22:03
- [spf-discuss] To appeal or not to appeal? SUMMARY, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Frank Ellermann, 15:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Frank Ellermann, 15:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, John A. Martin, 15:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: appeal, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Julian Mehnle, 15:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Julian Mehnle, 15:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Julian Mehnle, 15:10
- [spf-discuss] Private messages to the council (was: Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06), Julian Mehnle, 15:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Constantine A. Murenin, 15:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Constantine A. Murenin, 14:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: appeal, Jeff Macdonald, 14:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Julian Mehnle, 14:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Jeff Macdonald, 14:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, Frank Ellermann, 13:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: [RFC State] <draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02> has changed state, wayne, 13:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06, Frank Ellermann, 11:38
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Frank Ellermann, 11:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: appeal, Frank Ellermann, 11:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:08
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Frank Ellermann, 11:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: appeal, Frank Ellermann, 10:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] appeal, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:48
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06, Julian Mehnle, 10:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Frank Ellermann, 10:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06, william(at)elan.net, 10:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Julian Mehnle, 10:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Julian Mehnle, 10:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06, Frank Ellermann, 10:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] appeal, Julian Mehnle, 10:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Jeff Macdonald, 09:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Hector Santos, 09:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] appeal, Jeff Macdonald, 09:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] appeal, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Julian Mehnle, 09:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Graham Murray, 08:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06, Julian Mehnle, 08:41
- [spf-discuss] appeal, Terry Fielder, 08:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: Weekly SPF-private stats for 02/06/06, Frank Ellermann, 07:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Steven Dorst, 07:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Constantine A. Murenin, 07:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Dotzero, 06:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, william(at)elan.net, 04:56
February 05, 2006
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Hector Santos, 23:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Hector Santos, 23:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Frank Ellermann, 12:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Scott Kitterman, 09:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, John Hinton, 04:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Council requests additional information from SPF Community on if IAB appeal is appropriate, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:50
February 01, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Statistics on .JP domains using SPF, Frank Ellermann, 21:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Email Authentication Summit, Leonard Mills, 16:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Email Authentication Summit, Julian Mehnle, 14:42
- [spf-discuss] DKIM Email Authentication Summit, Leonard Mills, 14:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: Problem with http://www.openspf.org/why.htm, Julian Mehnle, 14:26
- Re: [spf-discuss] Statistics on .JP domains using SPF, william(at)elan.net, 01:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Statistics on .JP domains using SPF, Craig Whitmore, 01:04
- [spf-discuss] Statistics on .JP domains using SPF, william(at)elan.net, 00:15