On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Hector Santos wrote:
Related to #3, convince me why I should vote yes for an appeal, by
showing me how MS actions or "Sender ID Experiment" will harm me normal
SPF v1.0 or SPF classic implementations, including those with or with no
plans to support Sender ID?
I don't support SenderID nor do we have any plans to do so? Is there
going to be a harm to my product line operations and/or customers? If
so, how so?
M$ implementations will read your SPF classic records, and pretend
that they are a sender policy for PRA instead of MFROM. To stop this,
you will have to publish sender id records also. So the "damage" is requiring
millions of domain owners that don't want to participate in sender id
to publish sender id records just so that they can continue to
participate in SPF classic and still be able to send mail to M$
customers.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com