-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
[...] The abuser will simply point to Microsoft documentation and say,
"this says you should publish v=spf1 only if MFROM and PRA and the same".
Who are they going to believe, an experimental RFC, or Microsoft
documentation?
Most people can't tell an "Experimental" RFC from an "Internet Standard"
one, because they simply don't know it makes a difference. To many, an
RFC is an RFC is an RFC. No need to point out the allegedly "experi-
mental" nature of SPF to those who don't care.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD54T9wL7PKlBZWjsRAsauAKDurAsMUif1fyBCo9ri1rmrJEESvACfUcKR
CgsGjKey67VkDhx+3IxfyPY=
=j/Bm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com