On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:10:00PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
point to Microsoft documentation and say, "this says you
should publish v=spf1 only if MFROM and PRA and the same".
Really, it actually says that? Where?
In Craig's example posted the day before yesterday here:
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/20269>
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/20271>
ESPC isn't MS (although they are a member). So I don't think Craig's
example is a valid example.
Could we ask them to change that to a MUST instead of SHOULD
The appeals were more about SHOULD NOT instead of SHOULD, and
that's exactly the opposite direction of what you propose.
Seems I got mixed up. MS should only advise people to publish
spf2.0 records for PRA purposes and use v=spf1 for MFROM.
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com