On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
<snip>
But a successful appeal will not "force PRA to use its own records".
It will only allow you to point to an experimental RFC and say
"you shouldn't be using v=spf1 records for PRA". The abuser will simply
point to Microsoft documentation and say, "this says you should
publish v=spf1 only if MFROM and PRA and the same".
Really, it actually says that? Where?
I haven't found it yet (someone have it?), but someone posted to
spf-discuss an encounter with a mail admin using sender-id who quoted the
manual from M$ on when to publish various types of records. The gist was,
that if your MFROM and PRA were different, you should publish spf2.0/pra
and spf2.0/mfrom, whereas if they were the same, you should publish just
v=spf1. This is wrong on so many levels, it leaves me tongue tied. But it
just reiterates the Sender-ID RFC.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com