-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Kelly wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
John Kelly wrote:
I wonder how many ISPs will tolerate the administrative burden and
expense of maintaining SPF exceptions for individual customers.
My guess would be a number somewhere between few and none.
Probably the same as are taking on the administrative burden and
expense of maintaining individual spam filter settings for their
customers.
Probably?
What odds did you have in mind, 1 in a million?
Talks of guessing and accuses me of the same...
Don't feed the troll.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEA4qBwL7PKlBZWjsRArdWAKC9YeVz3DAua6gFqTAweJLbU5zRRwCZAbMs
y8YAgUI+4YCzTxD+j8tLC/k=
=gqQb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com