John Kelly wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:23 -0500, Scott Kitterman
<spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com>
wrote:
SPF has complexities galore that are an impediment to adoption, but
there are enough people checking SPF that since I adopted it, my
forged bounce problem (and by implication forgery of my domain) has
to almost nothing.
And the spammers just move on to forging domains without SPF records.
At some point critical mass is reached and putting an SPF record on a domain
becomes a Best Practice. If a company or organization doesn't put an SPF
record on a domain after that point, lack-of-a-record may be an indication to
greylist or even add spam points.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com