-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hector Santos wrote:
[...] "80%" is something most thinking people can relate too, especially
in anything technical related. "Substantial portion" means nothing
because it raises doubt about "what is substantial?" Some people might
think 5% is a substantial portion. If you want to use "great majority"
or just "majority" that would suffice.
I wrote "significant number of cases" in the draft appeal because I cannot
give exact numbers, but we all know the number is "significant", i.e. not
irrelevant. And even if it was just 5% (and it's probably more), we
couldn't just drop 5% of all mail, so it would still be significant.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD6km6wL7PKlBZWjsRAknVAKCm+zQuIPQAfeLC3cVXr0NBOdtGdgCgjiWo
7YvpfaFhIgdtUfUj+gTOjzc=
=A+fu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com