spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Preparing the IAB appeal

2006-02-08 11:32:30

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>

<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/17067/>
| 2822.PRA  = 2821.MailFrom :  88%

So that would be a problem for 12% of the mails.  There are 39
articles written by "Hector Santos" and archived by GMaNe with
a match for the string "80".  I'm not going to check all, let's
forget it, "substantial portion" is good enough, and everybody
knows this.

Frank,

It is called "Pareto's Principle", "80:20" rule, etc.  A very successful
strategy used in life, economics, statistics, management, planning,
decision making, etc.  "80%" is something most thinking people can
relate too, especially in anything technical related.  "Substantial
portion" means nothing because it raises doubt about "what is
substantial?"  Some people might think 5% is a substantial portion.  If
you want to use "great majority" or just "majority" that would suffice.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com






-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com